Construction
Industry Under Attack – Urge Your Senator to Stand Up for the Construction
Industry in Immigration Debate
A bi-partisan group of Senators – Schumer (D-N.Y.), McCain (R-Ariz.), Durbin
(D-Ill.), Graham (R-S.C.), Menendez (D-N.J.), Rubio (R-Fla.), Bennet (D-Colo.),
and Flake (R-Ariz.) – are working on an important piece of immigration reform –
the future temporary worker visa program. These Senators are currently
considering excluding the construction industry from any future temporary worker
visa program. That would make construction the only industry not eligible to
legally bring in temporary workers if they are needed.
Very few details have
been agreed upon, but this is the first contentious issue being fought over. The
construction industry employs nearly 6 million people; forecasts show the
industry adding two million more people to construction payrolls by 2020. The
last time major immigration reform was signed into law was 1986, so if this
bi-partisan group continues to move forward along these lines, the construction
industry may be forced to comply with these rules for decades.
Tell your Senators to object to any effort to exclude construction employers
from being able to access legal foreign temporary workers in the future. The
scope of the temporary worker visa program should be the same for all
industries. Your Senator needs to know that singling out an industry makes no
sense. The nation’s immigration policy should be guided by economics and sound
rational policy across all industries. It should not be guided by fear and
misconceptions. Taking away the tools our industry may need in the future will
only hurt the industry's ability to adapt to economic cycles and growth in the
future.
For more information, please contact Jim Young at (202) 547-0133
or youngj@agc.org.
|
The VA’s billion dollar boondoggle
A long-planned Veterans Affairs hospital being built in Denver, already hundreds of millions of dollars over its $604 million budget, has turned into a billion-dollar boondoggle for the agency. The contractor, Kiewit-Turner, blames the VA for ignoring agreements to submit plans that can be built within budget and has asked a federal board overseeing civilian contract disputes to let the company walk away from the job. Problems with the building emerged in January, when letters between the builder and the VA revealed the project to be running some $200 million over budget, with Kiewit-Turner blaming a pricey design that was only partially completed by the time it entered into the contract. The two sides subsequently agreed — via a handwritten agreement — to build the hospital within the original budget, with the VA in charge of submitting a new, pared-down design reflecting a number of cost-saving measures. But in a July 8 complaint to the Civilian Board of Contract Appeals, ...
Comments
Post a Comment